Competitive Cyber-Insurance and Internet Security

This paper investigates how competitive cyber-insurers affect network security and welfare of the networked society. In our model, a user’s probability to incur damage (from being attacked) depends on both his security and the network security, with the latter taken by individual users as given. First, we consider cyberinsurers who cannot observe (and thus, affect) individual user security. This asymmetric information causes moral hazard. Then, for most parameters, no equilibrium exists: the insurance market is missing. Even if an equilibrium exists, the insurance contract covers only a minor fraction of the damage; network security worsens relative to the no-insurance equilibrium. Second, we consider insurers with perfect information about their users’ security. Here, user security is perfectly enforceable (zero cost); each insurance contract stipulates the required user security. The unique equilibrium contract covers the entire user damage. Still, for most parameters, network security worsens relative to the no-insurance equilibrium. Although cyber-insurance improves user welfare, in general, competitive cyber-insurers fail to improve network security. Nikhil Shetty UC Berkeley, Berkeley-94720, e-mail: [email protected] Galina Schwartz UC Berkeley, Berkeley-94720, e-mail: [email protected] Mark Felegyhazi ICSI, Berkeley-94704, e-mail: [email protected] Jean Walrand UC Berkeley, Berkeley-94720, e-mail: [email protected]